3 ms·
This is absurdly reductionist.
by 001sky 13y ago
This is absurdly reductionist.
- pjscott 13y agoAssume for a moment that I don't know what you mean by 'reductionist'; why is it wrong?
- 001sky 13y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductionism[#] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductionism[#] In other words, you by failing to distinguish scaling phenomena (1->N) with a gating criteria (0,1), you are making an attribution error concerning the "essentialness" of your explanatory variable. For example: co-founders are typically not "interviewed" for the job. But (a) their selection is essential; and (b) if you can find a co-founder, you can find any lesser employee. It could be argued, that having the ability to "recruit" without formal interview is actually a more essential skill.
- Arnor 13y agoBetter than absurdly pompous...