4 ms·
People who were at Caltech at the time have gone on record that Wolfram knew very little about compilers when he wrote Mathematica: http://groups.google.com/gr
by georgewfraser 13y ago
People who were at Caltech at the time have gone on record that Wolfram knew very little about compilers when he wrote Mathematica:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/msg/f3b93140c2f2e922 http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/msg/f3b93140c2...
which explains why the Mathematica language contains so many amateurish mistakes, like its bizarre implementation of scope and its wacky pseudo-macro system. Don't get me wrong, Mathematica is a great product, in particular the standard library is fantastic, but the language itself is a mess.
- programnature 13y agoSmug lisp weenie complains commercially successful system not implemented in lisp, news at 11. The story isn't about Mathematica, its about SMP, which predated Mathematica by about 8 years. Wolfram was 20 at the time. Back at Caltech, Rob Pike convinced Wolfram that C was the future and that was a good thing.