4 ms·
Look at the Salary row, this claims they were running an exchange handling hundreds of millions worth of assets with a salary that would be a struggle to hire a
by eterm 13y ago
Look at the Salary row, this claims they were running an exchange handling hundreds of millions worth of assets with a salary that would be a struggle to hire an accountant, a developer, security consultant, or anyone else you'd need to successfully run an exchange at that size.
If you believe this leak, take what you will from that.
Edit: Just noticed the subcountractor payment, fair enough but it seems like every person who worked there was a subcontractor then.
- at-fates-hands 13y ago>>> fair enough but it seems like every person who worked there was a subcontractor then. Just my experience but when a majority of your workforce is temp contractors, it does not lend itself to consistent quality over time. Full disclosure: I've been a contractor for 3 years now.
- DanBC 13y ago> Just noticed the subcountractor payment, fair enough but it seems like every person who worked there was a subcontractor then. Isn't that just a normal tax dodge?
- toomuchtodo 13y agoIt really depends. If you dictate what needs to be done, but not how or when, that's usually legit. But if they're showing up at an office, have to follow your rules, etc, yes, its a tax dodge.
- rjtavares 13y agoUsually more of a labor law dodge than a tax dodge.
- toomuchtodo 13y agoAgreed, although you're usually trying to avoid paying your portion of payroll and unemployment taxes.
- kalleboo 13y agoMost of their support staff/ID verification people etc were international. It's probably way easier to do that kind of hiring as contractors than staff (how would labour laws even work with international staff?)