3 ms·
That's certainly been discussed many times. It's an interesting concept. The main downside though is that if each site has its own renderer, with no shared conc
by azakai 13y ago
That's certainly been discussed many times. It's an interesting concept. The main downside though is that if each site has its own renderer, with no shared concepts like the current web has, then you lose out on things like easily making accessibility tools, web scraping, etc. etc.
The benefits are also clear though, basically not being limited to current standards.
- stoptalkingshit 13y agoPeople have been parroting this nonsense for years. You have WebGL etc in the browser now. Web "pages" aren't pages anymore, and there is no way to enforce semantically meaningful markup. All that's been accomplished by fighting against the future is to ensure that all these low level services were implemented poorly. You can have all your high-level, common concepts but they need to be built onto a layered system. What we have now is a laughable mess, and it proves that the browser vendors have no idea what they're doing.