3 ms·
I don't think a simple 10.9.1.1 (10.9.1 which was already tested, plus JUST the one-line SecureTransport fix) would have required >24h testing. It was their de
by rdl 13y ago
I don't think a simple 10.9.1.1 (10.9.1 which was already tested, plus JUST the one-line SecureTransport fix) would have required >24h testing.
It was their decision to put the fix in 10.9.2 which is the problem. I agree rushing 10.9.2 would have been bad.
- Alphasite_ 13y agoYou don't know that at all. For all you know there are programs which depend on the undefined behaviour (very unlikely, but then what do we know?).
- oneeyedpigeon 13y agoIt wasn't 'undefined' behaviour, it was 'misdefined'. And I'm sure there are/were programs that depended on it; that's the worrying thing ...