4 ms·
Founders often mistakenly assume that they will own the IP as long as they pay a consulting company for its work. However, while payment is generally enough to
by grellas 17y ago
Founders often mistakenly assume that they will own the IP as long as they pay a consulting company for its work. However, while payment is generally enough to secure IP rights from employees, more is needed when dealing with contractors.
When it comes to rights in copyrighted work product, a consultant will own the IP unless a contract explicitly treats it as a work for hire or unless the rights are expressly assigned by the contract.
As appears from this piece, these rules are so fundamental that even a startup that pays a large amount of money can still be found not to own the IP resulting from that development work. Even with the litigation, the only relief obtained by the company was a right to modify the work licensed to it, not owned by it. A disastrous outcome by any measure.
For a general discussion and some illustrations of how these rules work, see my write-up at http://grellas.com/faq_business_startup_015a.html http://grellas.com/faq_business_startup_015a.html.
- hugothefrog 17y agoDo you know if this is the case in the United Kingtom? Does anyone have any experience with this sort of thing in the UK?
- grellas 17y agoDon't know, since I am not a UK lawyer - here is a comprehensive discussion of work for hire that includes what appears to be an informed discussion of UK law on this point: http://bit.ly/ysePr http://bit.ly/ysePr (pdf)(concluding that the UK law is very similar to US with the except of certain categories of works). Hope this helps.
- dtf 17y agoThese are good points. But to be fair, in this case they haven't paid for the work. Should a company have a right to keep IP that it has commissioned and then refused to pay for?