I'd be interested to know quite how they're solving the "canonical names for everything" problem [0]. They're presumably making their own ontology, rather than

I'd be interested to know quite how they're solving the "canonical names for everything" problem [0]. They're presumably making their own ontology, rather than using someone else's. Also, best attribute name ever [1]: "BoundStateWaveFunctionMomentumRepresentationAbsoluteValueSquared" [0]: http://reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/CanonicalName.html http://reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/CanonicalName.html [1]: http://reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/PhysicalSystemData.html http://reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/PhysicalSystemData...