3 ms·
I'd assume not since your reply misses the point. The government's wiretap order and the subsequent contempt proceedings suggests that despite the technical p
by absherwin 13y ago
I'd assume not since your reply misses the point.
The government's wiretap order and the subsequent contempt proceedings suggests that despite the technical problems of Lavabit, the government did not get the data they sought. Had Snowden used GMail, do you believe the government would have received the information they sought?
This isn't security in the sense you'd use it in an audit. It's just a design decision. In the vernacular, designs that permit the release of private information are sometimes called insecure.
- mpyne 13y agoLavabit was just as susceptible to a state warrant though. That's why Levison had to shut it down (despite having no objection with complying with other warrants previously).