4 ms·
What's wrong with the claim? It's only dependent on getting the D-D fusion reaction burning (which we're still a long way off). Second only to matter/antimatte
by drjesusphd 13y ago
What's wrong with the claim? It's only dependent on getting the D-D fusion reaction burning (which we're still a long way off).
Second only to matter/antimatter annihilation, nuclear fusion is the most energy-dense process in the universe. And the fuel consists of about 0.03% of the world's oceans.
- qntmfred 13y agoi wasn't aware that we had any accurate projections of the world's energy needs 30 million years from now
- drjesusphd 13y agoOf course we don't. A more accurate statement is that it would supply the world's present energy needs for 30 millions years.