I'm saying that the political process which leads to things like gov't required fast internet may also lead to greater encroachment upon said internet. It's an

I'm saying that the political process which leads to things like gov't required fast internet may also lead to greater encroachment upon said internet. It's an interesting way of thinking of things. Yesterday I listened to a discussion comparing the less regulated and more stable banking system of Canada to the heavily regulated and crash prone US banking system. Everyone in the US says that they want Canada's banking system, it's a common refrain. But do Americans want the political system which leads to such a banking system being implemented properly? As soon as you get to the Queen of England appointing US Senators, Americans tend to want to forget about the whole banking system thing. I suppose the point is this: If you tell the US political system to implement Korea style fast and cheap internet, what you're going to end up with is something much different from what you wanted. The same political forces which got you to your current location will filter this legislation as well. And you may end up with something far worse than the status quo.