3 ms·
The problem is that "viable" confuses what the purpose of the launch is. The purpose of the initial launch is to experiment and test a market and idea, not nece
by pkrein 13y ago
The problem is that "viable" confuses what the purpose of the launch is. The purpose of the initial launch is to experiment and test a market and idea, not necessarily to release something that is "viable" (in what sense?). If it's a test, let's call it a test. No need for it to have a confusing label like viable.
- wpietri 13y agoGiven that what I'm trying to learn from my tests is what's viable, it seems like a great word to me.
- siphor 13y agoTo me "minimum viable product" means a product that achieves a goal with the minimum amount of features. It doesn't necessarily have to test anything, but usually does. Maybe its not 'viable' in a market --> if you were using it to test its success in a market your test failed, but the minimum viable product still did something, and was thus viable.