4 ms·

This Verge article [1] says “The company will open source the vast majority of its code for the phone in order for third parties to properly audit its technique

• sspiff 13y ago
  If they do, that would go a long way to convincing me this is a tidbit more secure than any other random Android device. They should really have released their code at the same time they released their phone though.
  • theboss 13y ago
    I've talked to Silent Circle at conferences and what not. It is not like they have some crypto noob working on their project...They have Phil Zimmerman. But, knowing nothing about them, when I asked them ``How does your protocol compare to TextSecure's Axolotl?'' the response was ``We have Phil Zimmerman''. So....I'm still a bit put off by them. Some of their code is already open-sourced here. https://github.com/SilentCircle https://github.com/SilentCircle
    • StavrosK 13y ago
      As someone who works at Silent Circle (though not someone who can speak FOR SC), I'd say "Axolotl and SCIMP are both very good". Also, I don't know who you talked to, but keep in mind that not everyone working for SC is technical and can explain (or sometimes even knows) what Axolotl is/how it works.
• Ihmahr 13y ago
  "the vast majority" is exactly not enough.
• davexunit 13y ago
  That would be nice if they liberated some of the code. However, "vast majority" is another way of saying that the phone runs proprietary software. I think Replicant is still the only Android distribution that has the ability to provide any sort of real security to its users.