Some more annotated resources: 1. http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Web/Comparison_of_Happstack,_Snap_and_Yesod http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Web/Compari

Some more annotated resources: 1. http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Web/Comparison_of_Happstack,_Snap_and_Yesod http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Web/Comparison_of_Happsta... A relatively complete listing of resources comparing the three major framework/libraries. A lot of this information is outdated, sadly. 2. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5645168/comparing-haskells-snap-and-yesod-web-frameworks http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5645168/comparing-haskell... A SO question about comparing Snap and Yesod where both maintainers chime in. The major point of talking here is the Yesod style "Template Haskell" configuration. 3. http://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/l0fne/what_should_i_use_for_web_programming/ http://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/l0fne/what_should_i... A similar question posed to /r/haskell with a great comment by yogostoth demonstrating Yesod. 4. http://softwaresimply.blogspot.com/2012/04/hopefully-fair-and-useful-comparison-of.html http://softwaresimply.blogspot.com/2012/04/hopefully-fair-an... A relatively balanced view comparing the three feature by feature. Again a bit outdated, but well-informed. 5. http://softwaresimply.blogspot.com/2012/12/haskell-web-framework-matrix_20.html http://softwaresimply.blogspot.com/2012/12/haskell-web-frame... And finally my favorite summary of the whole thing: the Web Framework matrix which considers each as a web programming embedded DSL and talks about their relative merits in a 2x2 table.