(Note: The above comment was at '1' when I made this reply. So at least 4 people simply don't care that the info given above is a flat out lie as is shown by t

(Note: The above comment was at '1' when I made this reply. So at least 4 people simply don't care that the info given above is a flat out lie as is shown by the actual report that I link to below) Just pointing out what I did above. * The police report never says the officer heard the 911 call (http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2009/0723092gates1.html http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2009/0723092gates...) * The conversation is one's word against the other and Whalen is clearly trying to distance herself from the whole incident so she has the more reason to lie * That's just silly. I had a bronchial infection and I could still yell (albeit with vastly less capacity) * The report doesn't claim Gates refused to show ID only that he initially did. In fact it says... . I asked Gates to provide me with photo identification so that I could verify that he resided at Ware Street and so that I could radio my findings to ECC. Gates initially refused, demanding that I show him identification but then did supply me with a Harvard University identification card. Upon learning that Gates was affiliated with Harvard, I radioed and requested the presence of the Harvard University Police. * Your last claim could be right. No one can tell. But it's at the root of the two claims so the only way you can believe it's a proven fabrication is if you believe Gates without question (since he has as little proof as Crowley does as to what happened)