9 ms·

Mt.Gox's tweets are all gone

166 points by volaski 13y ago

Mithrandir 13y ago
Here are a few of the last tweets: https://archive.is/eDanx https://archive.is/eDanx Edit: And more at https://archive.is/https://twitter.com/MtGox/status/* https://archive.is/https://twitter.com/MtGox/status/*
erichurkman 13y ago
Well, that's certainly interesting. I wonder if it was Mt Gox themselves removing them, or hackers seizing the account.
- deleted 13y ago
  [deleted]
- volaski 13y ago
  It's actually been building up, so probably intentional http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303426304579401883794330454 http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB1000142405270230342630...
Oculus 13y ago
Wow that's eerie. It's as if they're trying to pretend it all never happened.
vinchuco 13y ago
Initially read this as: Mt.Gox tweets "all gone"
- volaski 13y ago
  That would have been epic
- joeblau 13y ago
  That would definitely be one of the craziest tweets of the year.
- 650REDHAIR 13y ago
  I was having flappy bird flashbacks when I read the title. I wonder if any MtGox customers have filed a lawsuit yet?
- BlackDeath3 13y ago
  Wasn't there a children's book entitled "All Gone"? Just an image of the cover of that book as a final tweet.
deanclatworthy 13y ago
A somewhat redundant exercise given all the tweet archiving and indexing services that are around nowadays. I can't help but think there's nothing sinister or suspicious here and more likely an account compromise.
- DelightfulScone 13y ago
  Why would it be more likely an account compromise?
- volaski 13y ago
  There was another news a couple of hours ago that they resigned from Bitcoin foundation board, so it indeed is very sinister https://bitcoinfoundation.org/blog/?p=462 https://bitcoinfoundation.org/blog/?p=462
  - deanclatworthy 13y ago
    Did you read my first point? Whilst I understand it's perfectly normal for BTC community members to jump to rash conclusions, I feel this time it's misguided given the numerous ways that tweets can be recovered. So what exactly would wiping them achieve?
    - DelightfulScone 13y ago
      I'm not much of a fan of "X probably didn't do Y because I cannot guess what would be to gain." There has been no word from Gox that their social account has been compromised so the clearest conclusion to guess is that they wiped their timeline. Why? That doesn't exactly matter before establishing who and right now the who seems to be Gox.
soheil 13y ago
Rebrand?
- SwellJoe 13y ago
  Merely rebranding won't resolve the millions in obligations they have to customers. There's real money at stake here; it's very unlikely that it will be something that can be swept under the rug.
DelightfulScone 13y ago
Google cache: https://www.google.com/#q=site:twitter.com%2Fmtgox https://www.google.com/#q=site:twitter.com%2Fmtgox
SwellJoe 13y ago
So, each bit of news coming out of Gox makes me more likely to assume the worst. When preparing for lawsuits, often the lawyers will recommend silence, and making sure that there are no public statements that are misleading. Given that they've been making reassuring comments all along, this makes me assume things are very bad indeed. I must assume they've been advised to stop making reassuring comments and saying things that could make them liable for more damages in court...or, worse, make them guilty of fraud. Maybe I'm jumping to conclusions. Anybody else got theories on why they'd do something so extreme? I certainly can't think of any positive reason for them to do so.
- gojomo 13y ago
  On the other hand, destroying evidence once a lawsuit is filed is a definite no-no. But what's one more no-no in a career of no-no's? An account compromise is possible. Perhaps they're about to take some steps they'd previously publicly assured people they wouldn't, and don't want the obsolete assurances to be easy-to-reference.
  - SwellJoe 13y ago
    That's a good theory...they may be figuring out that they can't possibly provide what they've promised, and are wanting to not have an easy trail of evidence of exactly what has been promised. But, I don't think deleting things from Twitter has ever been considered "destroying evidence" in court. But, I suppose there's a first for everything. Usually, it'd be manipulating or deleting emails that have been subpoenaed, or other sorts of contractually binding documents (email can be a contractually binding document, Twitter probably not...yet). I dunno. Maybe we're about to see something interesting and new happen in the courts. I guess we're certain to, because Bitcoin hasn't had much play in the courts, yet. Will be interesting to see how this plays out. I'm vaguely concerned that things that should be civil matters may end up becoming criminal matters because of the way Bitcoin is viewed by law enforcement and states. But, then again, this may very well be something that should become a criminal matter. I don't know enough to know.
    - 13y ago
gojomo 13y ago
They've clearly suffered a Twitter Malleability attack.
- MysticFear 13y ago
  I am not sure why people blame Mt. Gox for a problem within the Twitter protocol that always 'deletions'. We discussed the solution with the Twitter core developers and will allow our tweets to be displayed again once it has been approved and standardized.
  - edelans 13y ago
    "our tweets" ?
    - vidarh 13y ago
      He is mocking the way MtGox tried to pass the buck for their inability to deal with the malleability issue to Bitcoin core developers.
tommaxwell 13y ago
Has to be some real shit 'bout to go down
webkike 13y ago
Mt. Gox was weak, and they died.
verroq 13y ago
IMHO, this is a ruse. Only Gox knows if they are going under or not. By playing up the trend of bad news, they are forcing down the prices of Gox BTC which they can buy up at extremely generous prices. The more they make it look like they are screwed, the cheaper people will sell. Thus they can keep this facade up for months. As long as they don't go under, they profit.
- blazespin 13y ago
  It's also possible they're not doing this out of greed but as a way to actually rescue their company. They may owe a lot of money and the only way they can make it through this without going under is by buying all the bitcoin back at a low value. The question is, how far do they go, and how much of the retained earnings do they commit to rescuing the company and how much of these retained earnings have already found their way into individual executive bank accounts.
  - mcv 13y ago
    That's still dishonest if they hold other people's bitcoins hostage so they have no recourse but to sell them to Mt Gox at low value. Their customers are at their mercy, and they're taking full advantage of that.
  - TheCraiggers 13y ago
    That is an interesting thought, except they would have zero trust or goodwill left with the community. They might be able to rescue the company financially but I don't see any chance of the company surviving after that.
pmorici 13y ago
Check out the recent update to this YouTube video... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UP1YsMlrfF0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UP1YsMlrfF0 Apparently liquidity problems and solvency problems are different problems, who knew.
- tlrobinson 13y ago
  Oh wow. I see 3 possibilities: 1. Mt Gox is going under, probably this week. 2. These people are utterly clueless about public relations and how the public perceives their actions. 3. This is all a big prank. You've been punked.
  - zimpenfish 13y ago
    4. Mt Gox is no longer liquid because the Feds have their (encrypted) wallet (ok, this is probably a bit too far down the conspiracy path)
- bachback 13y ago
  wow. how misleading was that...
- JanezStupar 13y ago
  Its the banks! They are able to service trillions of transactions between countries, but are not capable of servicing a couple of millions to a website. Yeah, right.
  - vidarh 13y ago
    If they have banking problems it has nothing to do with banks ability, but about banks willingness. International banking can be difficult, and almost all of that difficulty is about banks worried about fraud and money laundering. E.g. I remember trying to pay someone in Russia for some work some years back, only to find out my bank considered the Russian bank "too risky", and I had to transfer money via the Russian banks account in some US bank. When you're trying to be an exchange for a currency not supported by any government, I'm sure that's raised a ton of red flags in a lot of banks. Note I'm not saying that is sufficient to explain MtGox's current predicament, but there's also every reason to assume that they have some degree of banking problems.
AdamGibbins 13y ago
Their account was full of some bot gone-wrong spam, deleting all would have been an easy cleanup. People are jumping to conclusions a tad rapidly.
- kyberias 13y ago
  This is a valuable observation.
frade33 13y ago
grabs popcorn I am an asian, therefore my comment shouldn't be taken as racial. The moment I realized, Mt.Gox was an asian enterprise, (based in asia) I became wary of them, and put them on my least priority. I want people to transact their wealth/money only with those companies, which are located in countries, which have good repute for accountability and have strong judicial system. I don't mean, Japan is not one of those. But I don't know, I still can't put faith with any Asian company as yet, when it involves 'money'.
- creamyhorror 13y ago
  Even though the founder isn't Asian at all, but a French techie who moved the Japan to become an entrepreneur? And the top management appear to all be non-Asian? I'm not saying your concerns don't have some basis, but MtGox was not a relevant example. Unless you mean that Westerners moving to Asia to set up businesses automatically can't be trusted either.
  - frade33 13y ago
    I wasn't talking about individuals, instead the company and where it is based at.
- jnbiche 13y ago
  >I am an asian, therefore my comment shouldn't be taken as racial. Just as a point of fact, it is logically possible to be racist against one's own ethnic/racial group. That said, I don't think your remark is at all racist, so I'm not sure why you felt the need to mention your background.
- uchi 13y ago
  The moment I realized that mtgox stood for fucking magic the gathering online exchange is when I became weary/started laughing at people who put their imaginary fun bux in there, Asian enterprise notwithstanding.
- Renaud 13y ago
  I'm not Asian but I live in Hong Kong and I never had this impression. Most countries look at Bitcoin with some interest and suspicion. I don't think that being Asian gives you super powers just like being Westerner gives me any more insight about the financial stability of Western countries. If you know something specific about laws or business practices in Japan that may shed a light on the whole issue then feel free to enlighten us. I would say though that your trust in Western institutions is a bit misplaced. Enron lost billions and ruined lives. You could say that some of the culprits are in prison but that's poor consolation for those who lost everything. More recently, the whole of the banking industry almost collapsed under the weight of its own greed and malpractices, bringing down with it whole countries and forcing tax payers to foot the bill to prop up these honorable institutions.
kmfrk 13y ago
Hey, at least there's a chance they might finally delete all the sensitive user data they have on hand - presumably stored in a less-than-secure fashion. Apparently, this is what it takes.
sergiotapia 13y ago
I'm kind of in the dark about Mt.Gox, is their recent downfall just the fault of inexperience when dealing with complex code and Bitcoin or did the team at Mt.Gox actually act with malice, attempting to steal money from people? Is Mt.Gox just a startup made of 2 brothers and a fullstack engineer that happened to hit it big and muck up brilliantly when they scaled? Part of me feels really sad (granted I don't participate in Bitcoin at all) because these guys may actually go to jail for fraud. I just want to know if my moral compass is pointing in the right direction.
- DanBC 13y ago
  There comes a point where incompetence is indistinguishable from malice. MtGox has had so many incidents that they would have faced sanctions in a regulated market. But then the people giving money to MtGox should have seen just how flaky MtGox was. It is sad and frustrating that this happened. I kind of want bitcoin to take off. And I especially want to avoid saying "told you so" because that's just being a dick.
  - zmk_ 13y ago
    It is easy to say these things in hindsight. A year ago Mt. Gox was the paragon of the 'industry'.
    - joepie91_ 13y ago
      Not really. A year ago, it had already been crap for quite a while... it just still had a sizable club of apologists saying "don't be so hard on them, they've done so much good".
    - DanBC 13y ago
      No way. A year ago there were plenty of articles about the latest MtGox hacking or whatever.
- Aqueous 13y ago
  They failed to set up a proper testing pipeline. They failed to fix known issues with their BitCoin implementation after months. This would have been much easier had they actually built up their organization with all the profits they were seeing. As CEO Karpeles should not be touching code - he should be managing what was a large and growing company and building up a competent organization so that it could adequately manage a quickly growing amount of other people's wealth. But judging by the fact that Karpeles has still been coding himself, Gox did not build up its organization at all. It seems like he probably wanted his overhead to stay low and avoid paying people who were better than he was to fix the rather significant problems with their BitCoin implementation. Which means this isn't just a tale of incompetence it's a tale of greed.
booleanbetrayal 13y ago
I think it's evident that frameworks are being drawn to wrestle "the bitcoin question" into some mechanism of control / oversight. Look to US exchanges that partner and work within these frameworks to remain in good graces. I imagine that's the reality of it.
beedogs 13y ago
relax, they're just pivoting and will relaunch next week as an RPG card trading exchange.
steven2012 13y ago
Are these the actions of a company that intends to stay in business? I would hazard a guess that the answer to that question is "No." Who would be foolish enough to keep their money with mtgox after 3 weeks of silence, and now with them seemingly erasing their footprint off the Internet? Even the worst businessperson would know their actions are jeopardizing their viability as a business. So, based on that assumption that they know they will no longer be in business, you need to decide, are they going to make their users whole before shutting down, or not? Again, I would hazard a guess that the high-probability answer is that they will not make their users whole. If they had enough money, it would seem that knowing they are going to go out of business, the best thing to do is make their customers whole and close up shop. The fact they aren't do this, to me, suggests they are attempting to protect themselves. If my guess is correct, then it suggests that they don't have enough money and are trying to figure out how best to save themselves from being sued or worse.
- sspiff 13y ago
  I withdrew my money a couple of weeks ago to a European bank account, shortly before the news of their issues broke. It wasn't a fortune but it was a large enough amount to care about. Still hasn't made it onto my account. I doubt it ever will at this point.
  - pille 13y ago
    There is hope. I ordered a SEPA withdrawal around New Year's Day, and received the deposit a few days ago. It was a very pleasant surprise to see the funds actually show up.
  - scottcanoni 13y ago
    I have been waiting since October for a transfer of USD to my bank account for an amount that I had sold 1 BTC for USD. I have had an open support ticket with them for 3 months now and they have held my money hostage. Just last week when the price of BTC was lower than what I had sold mt BTC for, I asked them to cancel the withdrawal and credit my account. I then proceeded to purchase back more BTC than I had sold originally over 4 months ago. Unfortunately my BTC is still held hostage until they reinstate BTC withdrawals but their support has confirmed that I will be able to withdraw my BTC.
ebbv 13y ago
About 6 months ago (when Mt Gox had some other issues with people's money) I said: > If you trusted a company that started out trading Magic: the Gathering cards with a significant amount of your money, you probably need the lesson you are going to learn from this. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6264666 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6264666 And was mocked/dismissed. It's disheartening to me the blind spot that otherwise intelligent people have when it comes to BitCoin and BitCoin related businesses.
- orclev 13y ago
  I pulled my money out of MtGox about 6 months ago... unfortunately I'm still waiting for them to process the wire transfer I requested, and this makes me suspect I may never actually see that money.
- pessimizer 13y ago
  Probably because what they bought the domain for was utterly irrelevant to their competence or complete lack thereof. The enemy is stupid the overcredulous decision-making of ideologues and the incompetence of people who want to handle your money. Adding more dumb information just confuses the issue.
- weavejester 13y ago
  Most of the replies you link to were just pointing out your comment was incorrect, or that judging tech companies based on their name isn't a particularly good approach. I don't see anyone defending MtGox's competence or business practices.
jrockway 13y ago
Not a great day to be a Libertarian. When their domain goes up for sale, I'm going to buy it and start an online exchange for Magic cards.
- cheez 13y ago
  So in the current EU/US political climate, MtGox would be bailed out, meaning people who didn't invest their money with MtGox would be forced to make the people who did whole. Whereas in the current BitCoin climate, the investors suffer and will be forced to sue MtGox to reclaim their money. Which is morally better? No libertarian will tell you that either of these is a preferred outcome, but out of the two, the morally superior one should be relatively obvious. Edit: The reason I say it would be bailed out is not because they are investment accounts but precisely because it was so huge in the BitCoin economy.
  - stevewilhelm 13y ago
    Checking accounts, savings accounts, and CD are protected by FDIC. Brokerage accounts for doing FX speculation are not insured. [1] http://www.fdic.gov/consumers/consumer/information/fdiciorn.html http://www.fdic.gov/consumers/consumer/information/fdiciorn....
  - stingraycharles 13y ago
    MtGox is an exchange, not a bank. I'm mentioning this because there is an important third person with a bank: the customer, not the investor. With mtgox, every customer is an investor. When bailing out a bank, however, the rationale is often to help out the people who cannot be blamed: the customers. I'm still not claiming that bailing out I banks is a good thing, but the comparison you make is a small apples/oranges thing.
    - cheez 13y ago
      This sounds a lot like the too big to fail argument and so it is not an apples/oranges thing. It's a sliding scale and the only reason it seems like it is apples and oranges to you is precisely because MtGox isn't big enough. I'm not saying that customers of a bank should suffer for the investment side but let the investors suffer for their bad investments, if the political will is there.
carrja99 13y ago
Did you ever read their twitter feed? It was nothing but auto-responders!
gamebak 13y ago
Hmm if Mt. Gox doesn't plan to get back it will be a huge backside for bitcoins :(
frade33 13y ago
Even thinking about it, makes me feel dirty. But since things can’t get any worse than this, let me please ask this. Is it mere coincidence that the creator of Bitcoin is of the same origin as the Mt. Gox. I am feeling guilty for asking this, and I would be pleased, if I remain guilty forever for asking this, than otherwise.
- Aqwis 13y ago
  Neither the founder nor the current owner of Mt. Gox are Japanese. And Satoshi is unlikely to be Japanese anyway.

166 points by volaski 13y ago

Here are a few of the last tweets: https://archive.is/eDanx https://archive.is/eDanx Edit: And more at https://archive.is/https://twitter.com/MtGox/status/* https://archive.is/https://twitter.com/MtGox/status/*

erichurkman 13y ago

Well, that's certainly interesting. I wonder if it was Mt Gox themselves removing them, or hackers seizing the account.

deleted 13y ago
[deleted]
volaski 13y ago
It's actually been building up, so probably intentional http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303426304579401883794330454 http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB1000142405270230342630...

Oculus 13y ago

Wow that's eerie. It's as if they're trying to pretend it all never happened.

vinchuco 13y ago

Initially read this as: Mt.Gox tweets "all gone"

volaski 13y ago
That would have been epic
joeblau 13y ago
That would definitely be one of the craziest tweets of the year.
650REDHAIR 13y ago
I was having flappy bird flashbacks when I read the title. I wonder if any MtGox customers have filed a lawsuit yet?
BlackDeath3 13y ago
Wasn't there a children's book entitled "All Gone"? Just an image of the cover of that book as a final tweet.

deanclatworthy 13y ago

A somewhat redundant exercise given all the tweet archiving and indexing services that are around nowadays. I can't help but think there's nothing sinister or suspicious here and more likely an account compromise.

DelightfulScone 13y ago
Why would it be more likely an account compromise?
volaski 13y ago
There was another news a couple of hours ago that they resigned from Bitcoin foundation board, so it indeed is very sinister https://bitcoinfoundation.org/blog/?p=462 https://bitcoinfoundation.org/blog/?p=462
- deanclatworthy 13y ago
  Did you read my first point? Whilst I understand it's perfectly normal for BTC community members to jump to rash conclusions, I feel this time it's misguided given the numerous ways that tweets can be recovered. So what exactly would wiping them achieve?
  - DelightfulScone 13y ago
    I'm not much of a fan of "X probably didn't do Y because I cannot guess what would be to gain." There has been no word from Gox that their social account has been compromised so the clearest conclusion to guess is that they wiped their timeline. Why? That doesn't exactly matter before establishing who and right now the who seems to be Gox.

soheil 13y ago

Rebrand?

SwellJoe 13y ago
Merely rebranding won't resolve the millions in obligations they have to customers. There's real money at stake here; it's very unlikely that it will be something that can be swept under the rug.

DelightfulScone 13y ago

Google cache: https://www.google.com/#q=site:twitter.com%2Fmtgox https://www.google.com/#q=site:twitter.com%2Fmtgox

SwellJoe 13y ago

So, each bit of news coming out of Gox makes me more likely to assume the worst. When preparing for lawsuits, often the lawyers will recommend silence, and making sure that there are no public statements that are misleading. Given that they've been making reassuring comments all along, this makes me assume things are very bad indeed. I must assume they've been advised to stop making reassuring comments and saying things that could make them liable for more damages in court...or, worse, make them guilty of fraud. Maybe I'm jumping to conclusions. Anybody else got theories on why they'd do something so extreme? I certainly can't think of any positive reason for them to do so.

gojomo 13y ago
On the other hand, destroying evidence once a lawsuit is filed is a definite no-no. But what's one more no-no in a career of no-no's? An account compromise is possible. Perhaps they're about to take some steps they'd previously publicly assured people they wouldn't, and don't want the obsolete assurances to be easy-to-reference.
- SwellJoe 13y ago
  That's a good theory...they may be figuring out that they can't possibly provide what they've promised, and are wanting to not have an easy trail of evidence of exactly what has been promised. But, I don't think deleting things from Twitter has ever been considered "destroying evidence" in court. But, I suppose there's a first for everything. Usually, it'd be manipulating or deleting emails that have been subpoenaed, or other sorts of contractually binding documents (email can be a contractually binding document, Twitter probably not...yet). I dunno. Maybe we're about to see something interesting and new happen in the courts. I guess we're certain to, because Bitcoin hasn't had much play in the courts, yet. Will be interesting to see how this plays out. I'm vaguely concerned that things that should be civil matters may end up becoming criminal matters because of the way Bitcoin is viewed by law enforcement and states. But, then again, this may very well be something that should become a criminal matter. I don't know enough to know.
  - 13y ago

gojomo 13y ago

They've clearly suffered a Twitter Malleability attack.

MysticFear 13y ago
I am not sure why people blame Mt. Gox for a problem within the Twitter protocol that always 'deletions'. We discussed the solution with the Twitter core developers and will allow our tweets to be displayed again once it has been approved and standardized.
- edelans 13y ago
  "our tweets" ?
  - vidarh 13y ago
    He is mocking the way MtGox tried to pass the buck for their inability to deal with the malleability issue to Bitcoin core developers.

tommaxwell 13y ago

Has to be some real shit 'bout to go down

webkike 13y ago

Mt. Gox was weak, and they died.

verroq 13y ago

IMHO, this is a ruse. Only Gox knows if they are going under or not. By playing up the trend of bad news, they are forcing down the prices of Gox BTC which they can buy up at extremely generous prices. The more they make it look like they are screwed, the cheaper people will sell. Thus they can keep this facade up for months. As long as they don't go under, they profit.

blazespin 13y ago
It's also possible they're not doing this out of greed but as a way to actually rescue their company. They may owe a lot of money and the only way they can make it through this without going under is by buying all the bitcoin back at a low value. The question is, how far do they go, and how much of the retained earnings do they commit to rescuing the company and how much of these retained earnings have already found their way into individual executive bank accounts.
- mcv 13y ago
  That's still dishonest if they hold other people's bitcoins hostage so they have no recourse but to sell them to Mt Gox at low value. Their customers are at their mercy, and they're taking full advantage of that.
- TheCraiggers 13y ago
  That is an interesting thought, except they would have zero trust or goodwill left with the community. They might be able to rescue the company financially but I don't see any chance of the company surviving after that.

pmorici 13y ago

Check out the recent update to this YouTube video... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UP1YsMlrfF0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UP1YsMlrfF0 Apparently liquidity problems and solvency problems are different problems, who knew.

tlrobinson 13y ago
Oh wow. I see 3 possibilities: 1. Mt Gox is going under, probably this week. 2. These people are utterly clueless about public relations and how the public perceives their actions. 3. This is all a big prank. You've been punked.
- zimpenfish 13y ago
  4. Mt Gox is no longer liquid because the Feds have their (encrypted) wallet (ok, this is probably a bit too far down the conspiracy path)
bachback 13y ago
wow. how misleading was that...
JanezStupar 13y ago
Its the banks! They are able to service trillions of transactions between countries, but are not capable of servicing a couple of millions to a website. Yeah, right.
- vidarh 13y ago
  If they have banking problems it has nothing to do with banks ability, but about banks willingness. International banking can be difficult, and almost all of that difficulty is about banks worried about fraud and money laundering. E.g. I remember trying to pay someone in Russia for some work some years back, only to find out my bank considered the Russian bank "too risky", and I had to transfer money via the Russian banks account in some US bank. When you're trying to be an exchange for a currency not supported by any government, I'm sure that's raised a ton of red flags in a lot of banks. Note I'm not saying that is sufficient to explain MtGox's current predicament, but there's also every reason to assume that they have some degree of banking problems.

AdamGibbins 13y ago

Their account was full of some bot gone-wrong spam, deleting all would have been an easy cleanup. People are jumping to conclusions a tad rapidly.

kyberias 13y ago
This is a valuable observation.

frade33 13y ago

grabs popcorn I am an asian, therefore my comment shouldn't be taken as racial. The moment I realized, Mt.Gox was an asian enterprise, (based in asia) I became wary of them, and put them on my least priority. I want people to transact their wealth/money only with those companies, which are located in countries, which have good repute for accountability and have strong judicial system. I don't mean, Japan is not one of those. But I don't know, I still can't put faith with any Asian company as yet, when it involves 'money'.

creamyhorror 13y ago
Even though the founder isn't Asian at all, but a French techie who moved the Japan to become an entrepreneur? And the top management appear to all be non-Asian? I'm not saying your concerns don't have some basis, but MtGox was not a relevant example. Unless you mean that Westerners moving to Asia to set up businesses automatically can't be trusted either.
- frade33 13y ago
  I wasn't talking about individuals, instead the company and where it is based at.
jnbiche 13y ago
>I am an asian, therefore my comment shouldn't be taken as racial. Just as a point of fact, it is logically possible to be racist against one's own ethnic/racial group. That said, I don't think your remark is at all racist, so I'm not sure why you felt the need to mention your background.
uchi 13y ago
The moment I realized that mtgox stood for fucking magic the gathering online exchange is when I became weary/started laughing at people who put their imaginary fun bux in there, Asian enterprise notwithstanding.
Renaud 13y ago
I'm not Asian but I live in Hong Kong and I never had this impression. Most countries look at Bitcoin with some interest and suspicion. I don't think that being Asian gives you super powers just like being Westerner gives me any more insight about the financial stability of Western countries. If you know something specific about laws or business practices in Japan that may shed a light on the whole issue then feel free to enlighten us. I would say though that your trust in Western institutions is a bit misplaced. Enron lost billions and ruined lives. You could say that some of the culprits are in prison but that's poor consolation for those who lost everything. More recently, the whole of the banking industry almost collapsed under the weight of its own greed and malpractices, bringing down with it whole countries and forcing tax payers to foot the bill to prop up these honorable institutions.

kmfrk 13y ago

Hey, at least there's a chance they might finally delete all the sensitive user data they have on hand - presumably stored in a less-than-secure fashion. Apparently, this is what it takes.

sergiotapia 13y ago

I'm kind of in the dark about Mt.Gox, is their recent downfall just the fault of inexperience when dealing with complex code and Bitcoin or did the team at Mt.Gox actually act with malice, attempting to steal money from people? Is Mt.Gox just a startup made of 2 brothers and a fullstack engineer that happened to hit it big and muck up brilliantly when they scaled? Part of me feels really sad (granted I don't participate in Bitcoin at all) because these guys may actually go to jail for fraud. I just want to know if my moral compass is pointing in the right direction.

DanBC 13y ago
There comes a point where incompetence is indistinguishable from malice. MtGox has had so many incidents that they would have faced sanctions in a regulated market. But then the people giving money to MtGox should have seen just how flaky MtGox was. It is sad and frustrating that this happened. I kind of want bitcoin to take off. And I especially want to avoid saying "told you so" because that's just being a dick.
- zmk_ 13y ago
  It is easy to say these things in hindsight. A year ago Mt. Gox was the paragon of the 'industry'.
  - joepie91_ 13y ago
    Not really. A year ago, it had already been crap for quite a while... it just still had a sizable club of apologists saying "don't be so hard on them, they've done so much good".
  - DanBC 13y ago
    No way. A year ago there were plenty of articles about the latest MtGox hacking or whatever.
Aqueous 13y ago
They failed to set up a proper testing pipeline. They failed to fix known issues with their BitCoin implementation after months. This would have been much easier had they actually built up their organization with all the profits they were seeing. As CEO Karpeles should not be touching code - he should be managing what was a large and growing company and building up a competent organization so that it could adequately manage a quickly growing amount of other people's wealth. But judging by the fact that Karpeles has still been coding himself, Gox did not build up its organization at all. It seems like he probably wanted his overhead to stay low and avoid paying people who were better than he was to fix the rather significant problems with their BitCoin implementation. Which means this isn't just a tale of incompetence it's a tale of greed.

booleanbetrayal 13y ago

I think it's evident that frameworks are being drawn to wrestle "the bitcoin question" into some mechanism of control / oversight. Look to US exchanges that partner and work within these frameworks to remain in good graces. I imagine that's the reality of it.

beedogs 13y ago

relax, they're just pivoting and will relaunch next week as an RPG card trading exchange.

steven2012 13y ago

Are these the actions of a company that intends to stay in business? I would hazard a guess that the answer to that question is "No." Who would be foolish enough to keep their money with mtgox after 3 weeks of silence, and now with them seemingly erasing their footprint off the Internet? Even the worst businessperson would know their actions are jeopardizing their viability as a business. So, based on that assumption that they know they will no longer be in business, you need to decide, are they going to make their users whole before shutting down, or not? Again, I would hazard a guess that the high-probability answer is that they will not make their users whole. If they had enough money, it would seem that knowing they are going to go out of business, the best thing to do is make their customers whole and close up shop. The fact they aren't do this, to me, suggests they are attempting to protect themselves. If my guess is correct, then it suggests that they don't have enough money and are trying to figure out how best to save themselves from being sued or worse.

sspiff 13y ago
I withdrew my money a couple of weeks ago to a European bank account, shortly before the news of their issues broke. It wasn't a fortune but it was a large enough amount to care about. Still hasn't made it onto my account. I doubt it ever will at this point.
- pille 13y ago
  There is hope. I ordered a SEPA withdrawal around New Year's Day, and received the deposit a few days ago. It was a very pleasant surprise to see the funds actually show up.
- scottcanoni 13y ago
  I have been waiting since October for a transfer of USD to my bank account for an amount that I had sold 1 BTC for USD. I have had an open support ticket with them for 3 months now and they have held my money hostage. Just last week when the price of BTC was lower than what I had sold mt BTC for, I asked them to cancel the withdrawal and credit my account. I then proceeded to purchase back more BTC than I had sold originally over 4 months ago. Unfortunately my BTC is still held hostage until they reinstate BTC withdrawals but their support has confirmed that I will be able to withdraw my BTC.

ebbv 13y ago

About 6 months ago (when Mt Gox had some other issues with people's money) I said: > If you trusted a company that started out trading Magic: the Gathering cards with a significant amount of your money, you probably need the lesson you are going to learn from this. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6264666 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6264666 And was mocked/dismissed. It's disheartening to me the blind spot that otherwise intelligent people have when it comes to BitCoin and BitCoin related businesses.

orclev 13y ago
I pulled my money out of MtGox about 6 months ago... unfortunately I'm still waiting for them to process the wire transfer I requested, and this makes me suspect I may never actually see that money.
pessimizer 13y ago
Probably because what they bought the domain for was utterly irrelevant to their competence or complete lack thereof. The enemy is stupid the overcredulous decision-making of ideologues and the incompetence of people who want to handle your money. Adding more dumb information just confuses the issue.
weavejester 13y ago
Most of the replies you link to were just pointing out your comment was incorrect, or that judging tech companies based on their name isn't a particularly good approach. I don't see anyone defending MtGox's competence or business practices.

jrockway 13y ago

Not a great day to be a Libertarian. When their domain goes up for sale, I'm going to buy it and start an online exchange for Magic cards.

cheez 13y ago
So in the current EU/US political climate, MtGox would be bailed out, meaning people who didn't invest their money with MtGox would be forced to make the people who did whole. Whereas in the current BitCoin climate, the investors suffer and will be forced to sue MtGox to reclaim their money. Which is morally better? No libertarian will tell you that either of these is a preferred outcome, but out of the two, the morally superior one should be relatively obvious. Edit: The reason I say it would be bailed out is not because they are investment accounts but precisely because it was so huge in the BitCoin economy.
- stevewilhelm 13y ago
  Checking accounts, savings accounts, and CD are protected by FDIC. Brokerage accounts for doing FX speculation are not insured. [1] http://www.fdic.gov/consumers/consumer/information/fdiciorn.html http://www.fdic.gov/consumers/consumer/information/fdiciorn....
- stingraycharles 13y ago
  MtGox is an exchange, not a bank. I'm mentioning this because there is an important third person with a bank: the customer, not the investor. With mtgox, every customer is an investor. When bailing out a bank, however, the rationale is often to help out the people who cannot be blamed: the customers. I'm still not claiming that bailing out I banks is a good thing, but the comparison you make is a small apples/oranges thing.
  - cheez 13y ago
    This sounds a lot like the too big to fail argument and so it is not an apples/oranges thing. It's a sliding scale and the only reason it seems like it is apples and oranges to you is precisely because MtGox isn't big enough. I'm not saying that customers of a bank should suffer for the investment side but let the investors suffer for their bad investments, if the political will is there.

carrja99 13y ago

Did you ever read their twitter feed? It was nothing but auto-responders!

gamebak 13y ago

Hmm if Mt. Gox doesn't plan to get back it will be a huge backside for bitcoins :(

frade33 13y ago

Even thinking about it, makes me feel dirty. But since things can’t get any worse than this, let me please ask this. Is it mere coincidence that the creator of Bitcoin is of the same origin as the Mt. Gox. I am feeling guilty for asking this, and I would be pleased, if I remain guilty forever for asking this, than otherwise.

Aqwis 13y ago
Neither the founder nor the current owner of Mt. Gox are Japanese. And Satoshi is unlikely to be Japanese anyway.