> And all the "little people" whose land value is negatively impacted? They don't count? I don't see where I said this. I'm not even sure what you're arguing w

> And all the "little people" whose land value is negatively impacted? They don't count? I don't see where I said this. I'm not even sure what you're arguing with me over. The point is pretty clear, I think. It has more to do with this individual's greed and probably very little (if any) to do with environmental concerns.