5 ms·
This might not be an anti-net neutrality deal. Here are the details we know at this point: 1. Netflix is currently using Cogent 2. Comcast offered them a dire
by ffk 13y ago
This might not be an anti-net neutrality deal. Here are the details we know at this point:
1. Netflix is currently using Cogent
2. Comcast offered them a direct connection to their network via paid-peering.
3. Netflix agreed and will move over.
4. Nothing about net neutrality was mentioned in the article.
This deal is being referred to as paid-peering. Peering is a practice performed at ISPs where two ISPs hook up infrastructure and agree to maintain their sides without charging for bandwidth. Peering is a common practice among the industry, and content-providers are always looking for ways to peer with more ISPs because it drives down their overall cost of operations.
The article says nothing about net neutrality. We don't have enough information to say whether net neutrality was harmed in this deal. We can only speculate at this time. Hopefully we will hear more from Netflix on this.
[edit to fix list formatting]
- ivanca 13y agoYou don't seem to understand: This is not a technical issue; is a conceptual one, people are not going to read the details of the deal, rather to grab the idea and slowly believe that paying for better connection with a site/ISP is normal.
- MichaelGG 13y ago>rather to grab the idea and slowly believe that paying for better connection with a site/ISP is normal. Is is normal. ISPs are not equal. There's a reason you pay Level(3) a lot more than HE.
- eli 13y agoWhat's the real difference between holding peering connections for ransom versus implementing packet-level QoS?