3 ms·
It sounds like the ads were directed at Facebook pages. I don't think so, the article says After all, these are not clicks on a mere Facebook page, these are
by mehwoot 13y ago
It sounds like the ads were directed at Facebook pages.
I don't think so, the article says
After all, these are not clicks on a mere Facebook page, these are users who clicked through to an off-Facebook site.
I.e. the link that the user would go to after clicking the ad would be an off-facebook site, not a facebook page.
- tempestn 13y agoRight. The 160k clicks are not clicks on a mere Facebook page. Perhaps the original 606k that Facebook is talking about are though. And the 160k are the number of those that click through to the off-site page. Anyway, probably not. Was just a theory. The article could be clearer.