35 ms·

Yes, this is a much better description of the problem. FB is a really bad ad platform. Yes, you can use it & get good results, but that takes more luck & skil

Yes, this is a much better description of the problem. FB is a really bad ad platform. Yes, you can use it & get good results, but that takes more luck & skill than other platforms. From the article: "FB estimates that ~1% of their users are fake generating fake likes". But, if those accounts have 10-100 times more likes than real accounts, you can see that the polluting effect can dominate the overall activity.

georgemcbay 13y ago
Also 1% of 1.23 billion[1] is 12.3 million. Which might only be 1% of the total users but is still a very, very large number of fake people. [1] http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/04/facebook-10-years-mark-zuckerberg http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/04/facebook-1...
- alextingle 13y ago
  Yeah, and the 1.23 billion is going to be mostly ghost accounts anyway. People who check their FB once a week, if ever.
rikf 13y ago
It should be possible to determine fake from real accounts using various statistics like number of likes per account average number of time between likes etc etc, with all the brainpower at Facebook I am surprised they haven't significantly mitigated this problem. This is not a problem that can ever be completely solved as its a typical arms race between good and evil but i am surprised at how badly Facebook appears to be doing as others have noted perhaps its because it in there best interest or maybe its just more visible on Facebook then it would be on google addwords or similar.
- jonknee 13y ago
  It could be devastating to their business. Facebook is in a tough spot, they are done or nearly done growing in the US and much of the developed world. Most of this fraud seems to happen in emerging markets, the exact same ones much of their "growth" is coming from. If growth numbers go negative or even flat Wall Street would run away from FB faster than you can cancel an advertising campaign.
- fblp 13y ago
  Yes, we wrote about this at http://fbk.io/stopfakelikestoday http://fbk.io/stopfakelikestoday. In short Facebook could compare behaviour as you suggested (they've got a whole bunch of data scientists). An even more robust way would be making their phone number verification more thorough.
trothoun 13y ago
Presumably that 1% is continuously depleted by facebook's detection and deletion of fake accounts and continuously replenished by the creation or subversion of new accounts. A high turnover rate may drive the proportion of fraudulent activity on facebook still higher.
sjg007 13y ago
Retargeting seems like the only real viable option.

georgemcbay 13y ago

Also 1% of 1.23 billion[1] is 12.3 million. Which might only be 1% of the total users but is still a very, very large number of fake people. [1] http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/04/facebook-10-years-mark-zuckerberg http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/04/facebook-1...

alextingle 13y ago
Yeah, and the 1.23 billion is going to be mostly ghost accounts anyway. People who check their FB once a week, if ever.

rikf 13y ago

It should be possible to determine fake from real accounts using various statistics like number of likes per account average number of time between likes etc etc, with all the brainpower at Facebook I am surprised they haven't significantly mitigated this problem. This is not a problem that can ever be completely solved as its a typical arms race between good and evil but i am surprised at how badly Facebook appears to be doing as others have noted perhaps its because it in there best interest or maybe its just more visible on Facebook then it would be on google addwords or similar.

jonknee 13y ago
It could be devastating to their business. Facebook is in a tough spot, they are done or nearly done growing in the US and much of the developed world. Most of this fraud seems to happen in emerging markets, the exact same ones much of their "growth" is coming from. If growth numbers go negative or even flat Wall Street would run away from FB faster than you can cancel an advertising campaign.
fblp 13y ago
Yes, we wrote about this at http://fbk.io/stopfakelikestoday http://fbk.io/stopfakelikestoday. In short Facebook could compare behaviour as you suggested (they've got a whole bunch of data scientists). An even more robust way would be making their phone number verification more thorough.

trothoun 13y ago

Presumably that 1% is continuously depleted by facebook's detection and deletion of fake accounts and continuously replenished by the creation or subversion of new accounts. A high turnover rate may drive the proportion of fraudulent activity on facebook still higher.

sjg007 13y ago

Retargeting seems like the only real viable option.