3 ms·
> In Colorado, the first $40M in taxes each year are required to be allocated towards school funding, per the state constitution. Won't this end up like lotter
by erichurkman 13y ago
> In Colorado, the first $40M in taxes each year are required to be allocated towards school funding, per the state constitution.
Won't this end up like lottery funding "education" in most states? [1] A guaranteed $40M in funding to schools means the legislature will simply reduce funding by $40M and move the balance around the general fund to other initiatives.
I'm not arguing additional tax money is bad, but we shouldn't pretend this will product a windfall of available money for the Colorado school systems.
[1] http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/post/mega-millions-do-lotteries-really-benefit-public-schools/2012/03/30/gIQAbTUNlS_blog.html http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/post/mega-m...
- chimeracoder 13y ago> I'm not arguing additional tax money is bad, but we shouldn't pretend this will product a windfall of available money for the Colorado school systems. Nobody is - the point is that any attempt to repeal the law down the line can be viewed as a cut to the education budget. The point of the clause is not to generate revenue for the school system; it's to create political friction against reversing the law.
- dinkumthinkum 13y agoAre you under the impression that attempts to cut education budgets, especially direct ones, always fail?