Your analogy doesn't really make sense. What we are doing is saying: "This is an object language, this one is functional, this one is visual." Again, your pro

Your analogy doesn't really make sense. What we are doing is saying: "This is an object language, this one is functional, this one is visual." Again, your problem seems to be more one of not wanting us to call any programming language with any adjectives differentiating it from others ...