8 ms·
Nice piece of work. A few observations: (1) It would be good to be able to link from the site name itself in the results rather than having to hit the W3C/HTML/
by Edinburger 17y ago
Nice piece of work. A few observations:
(1) It would be good to be able to link from the site name itself in the results rather than having to hit the W3C/HTML/Trash icons. Also, I would show the icons by default rather than only on hover since otherwise the user might not discover them.
(2) The randomly changing background color on your page is 'cool' but it can be confusing for the user. A few times I thought I'd back-buttoned onto a different site.
(3) This is a very minor point but the vertical lines which contain the 'body' of the homepage look a little 'out' at some zoom levels on FF 3.0.12.
HTH.
- flooha 17y ago+1 Do you have ideas for more features? Since the validation gets passed to W3C, the main or only added feature is saving your URL list.
- jeroen 17y agoI started building this after a typo in one of my (otherwise perfectly valid) sites totally broke the layout in IE. With vldtr I now have an easier first line of defense against such breakage. Another site I've inherited doesn't validate at all. It has lots of pages that I can now revalidate all at once after each deployment. So indeed, the list is the main feature which distuingishes it from using the w3 validators directly. I'm considering more features, but I'm still thinking them through.
- jeroen 17y agoThanks for your comments. I'll try some alternatives for (1) and see if I can come up with a better UI.