3 ms·
You seem to be implying that the reason OS/2 lost to Windows is its Windows compatibility, but that implies that OS/2 could plausibly have won without compatibi
by pekk 13y ago
You seem to be implying that the reason OS/2 lost to Windows is its Windows compatibility, but that implies that OS/2 could plausibly have won without compatibility and that's a dodgy proposition.
- blueskin_ 13y agoI doubt it would ever have won, but the interoperability was (perhaps ironically) one of the nails in the coffin.