3 ms·
Actually, since ~9.2 you don't need pg_trgm. But yeah, I was kind of surprised that he was surprised about why PostgreSQL folks failed: they just didn't think
by cbsmith 13y ago
Actually, since ~9.2 you don't need pg_trgm.
But yeah, I was kind of surprised that he was surprised about why PostgreSQL folks failed: they just didn't think about whether the index was optimal.