> But in absence of this conflict, or the external meaning that is the cause of the (perceived) conflict, they wouldn't know what to do with their own existence

> But in absence of this conflict, or the external meaning that is the cause of the (perceived) conflict, they wouldn't know what to do with their own existence What nonsense. > "Google" is nothing more than a tightly-bound collection of humans. Yes, and collections of humans tend to exhibit emergent properties / behaviours which are not necessarily ideal in all respects. Discussion of these properties / behaviours, and their desirability, is not a bad thing. > They see the world in a black and white. "Us" and "them". This is humorous to see in a post expounding a false dichotomy between the "two" types of people in the world.