Your argument is that it's cheaper than solar, wind, and nuclear, and that makes it better? Isn't that the opposite of things that are best for society making

Your argument is that it's cheaper than solar, wind, and nuclear, and that makes it better? Isn't that the opposite of things that are best for society making the most money, which was your original point? Wouldn't society be benefited almost infinitely more if it could harness an almost infinite supply of energy?