4 ms·
I remember the v1, and this definitely looks a lot better. I have one suggestion though: the 3+3 main points on either side are the ones that people will probab
by dyu 19y ago
I remember the v1, and this definitely looks a lot better. I have one suggestion though: the 3+3 main points on either side are the ones that people will probably read first, so users should be able to easily understand how the process works. I had to read a second time slowly of the left side before I really got it, especially the first two points (more especially the second point). Maybe something like Talk to Experts in this area (I don't know if they usually can be qualified as experts, or maybe another wording for people who know these things).
If you don't get what I am saying I could try to rephrase it somehow..
- joefaron 19y agoI agree.. Trying to put the whole process into 3 short steps is difficult though.. I think because people define (and dont define) themselves as different things like "expert", "seller", "provider", or "qualified information source".. then its like what even is a "qualified information source" - i guess it could be a book? a website? a person? we just need an all including, short word, for this type of person.. that people can identity properly as the person providing insight to the market researchers/product managers.