3 ms·
You certainly deserve my upvote. :) You set out to correct a naive statistical assumption, computed it properly, and the result was about the same (not at all
by lutusp 13y ago
You certainly deserve my upvote. :)
You set out to correct a naive statistical assumption, computed it properly, and the result was about the same (not at all common for such problems). But you posted it anyway, in the spirit of sharing useful information.
As the Australians say, "Good on you, mate."
- sanoli 13y agoI second the upvote. This is exactly the awesome part of HN.