4 ms·
It is my experience with Haskell Arch packages, as the lack of forum feedback suggested to me, with my troubles with dependencies for pandoc or git-annex-bin,[0
by 616c 13y ago
It is my experience with Haskell Arch packages, as the lack of forum feedback suggested to me, with my troubles with dependencies for pandoc or git-annex-bin,[0] to go and cabal it.[1] That is just me.
I know that goes against the point of this whole post, but I wanted to learn more about Haskell and part of that for me was leaving the farm and running wild, so to speak.
[0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/haskell-setenv https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/haskell-setenv
[1]https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=173781 https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=173781
- nemetroid 13y agoThis is my experience as well, and the person who maintains "ghc/cabal-install/and the other haskell packages in [extra]" had a similar sentiment in a reddit thread[1] eight months ago. Cabal is able to give you enough headaches on its own. :-) I do love pacman and the Arch package database in most other regards, however. [1]: http://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/1f26hg/why_does_haskell_suck_on_arch/ca6wt0c