4 ms·
> Duck duck is barely usable ... but they don't spy on you. 1. You don't know that. 2. No search engine ever spied on you when they started.
by laureny 13y ago
> Duck duck is barely usable ... but they don't spy on you.
1. You don't know that.
2. No search engine ever spied on you when they started.
- rjzzleep 13y agoabsolutely true, but basically it just means, we need to make it easy to build search engine infrastructure
- sdegutis 13y agoI wonder if it's possible to make a search engine that people can verify is not spying on them. One where the source is truly open source. Not just on github, but where anyone who wants to can ssh into the server and have full read-only access to the whole system to verify that the code they see is really what's running. Sure, there'd be some security things to work out to make it balance how easy it'd be to hack it, but maybe it's doable.
- timmclean 13y agoSee also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homomorphic_encryption https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homomorphic_encryption
- jarofgreen 13y agoIf I can SSH in and have full read only access on the server what's to stop me seeing what other users are doing, thus ending user privacy?
- dandelion_lover 13y agoI am really surprised people on HN do not know about YaCy [1]. It's p2p opensource and free search engine. So it is verifiable. [1]. yacy.net
- a1a 13y ago1. I guess nothing is certain - but even if they are a complete hoax they still can't correlate searches with my other data (mobile, mail, documents, http header data from javascript api calls on basically every site I visit, ....). This correlation is something other search engines explicitly state that they will do. 2. You don't know that.
- herokusaki 13y ago> 1. You don't know that. Have they been audited? That could help.