5 ms·
Humans have a drive, a raison d'etre, intelligence being only a mean to fulfill that drive. Thing is that drive is uncertain/subjective. Learning can't be an
by erik14th 13y ago
Humans have a drive, a raison d'etre, intelligence being only a mean to fulfill that drive.
Thing is that drive is uncertain/subjective.
Learning can't be an objective by itself, intelligence is just a tool, from that perspective you can say there are already AI, like targeted ads, it learns about you and acts accordingly.
So to have a "generalist" AI, like human's intelligence is general, you'd have to have an objective like staying alive and build up from that.
- psionski 13y agoNo, it's not. Drive is the desire to maximise future available options (e.g. to not get trapped). There is already software that decides what to do without a human telling it what to do. For more see http://www.ted.com/talks/alex_wissner_gross_a_new_equation_for_intelligence.html http://www.ted.com/talks/alex_wissner_gross_a_new_equation_f...