4 ms·
Not quite true. They don't chain like that. A tells O that B has become a better choice, so a complex dance happens where: a new circuit is established from
by chronomex 13y ago
Not quite true. They don't chain like that. A tells O that B has become a better choice, so a complex dance happens where:
a new circuit is established from O to B,
O tells A to tell the handset to move over to B-owned network infrastructure,
the handset roams over to B,
O drops the circuit to A.
This is a special case of Inter-MSC Handover, and you can read the spec at https://archive.org/stream/etsi_ts_123_009_v03.03.00/ts_123009v030300p#page/n33/mode/2up https://archive.org/stream/etsi_ts_123_009_v03.03.00/ts_1230...
The relevant section is Sec. 7.3.2, "Description of the subsequent handover procedure ii): MSC-B to MSC-B'".
(They call your "O" by "A", your "A" by "B", and your "C" by "B'" (B prime). And an MSC is a Mobile Switching Center that usually handles about half a city's worth of towers.)
- spc476 13y agoIs that while a call is in progress? That sounds like what happens when a cell phone that is not in use, transfers from switch to switch like you describe. Or the instructor I had taught us outdated information.
- chronomex 13y agoHandover is for established calls. I'm not surprised your instructor wasn't quite spot-on, GSM is not a simple protocol.