I think it's the other way around. I assume that an AI will be more intelligent than us if we build it right. Then assuming that a randomly designed intelligen

I think it's the other way around. I assume that an AI will be more intelligent than us if we build it right. Then assuming that a randomly designed intelligence has the same goals as us is a huge assumption. Most humans don't even have the same goals, and we're 99% similar to each other. In other words - the assumption that a random intelligence shares our goals is a much bigger assumption than that a random intelligence will be just like us.