3 ms·
If an example can illustrate a difference between two formal methodologies, the example should be as simple as possible, right? It doesn't paint one as superior
by delluminatus 13y ago
If an example can illustrate a difference between two formal methodologies, the example should be as simple as possible, right? It doesn't paint one as superior to the other, but simply highlights the different methods by which they assign probabilities to events. If you make the example more complicated, the difference becomes less clear.
- pseut 13y agoRight, but my point is that "as simple as possible" in this case is still "very complicated." It's sort of like trying to use "Hello world" to explain the difference between static and dynamic typing.