3 ms·
"Money is not generally subject to a replevin action unless it is marked or packaged in such as way as to make it distinguishable." Source: http://rjcesq.com/?
by jackgavigan 13y ago
"Money is not generally subject to a replevin action unless it is marked or packaged in such as way as to make it distinguishable."
Source: http://rjcesq.com/?p=15 http://rjcesq.com/?p=15
- erichocean 13y agoHow is "US dollar bill B03542754F" not distinguishable?
- jackgavigan 13y agoI never said it wasn't. :-)
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- dzhiurgis 13y agoThe press lost the count ;-)
- malka 13y agoSo bitcoin is or is not money ? cause the US gov seems to want to gives the bitcoin the disadvantages of being considered a currency, without the advantages.
- maxerickson 13y agoWhich bitcoin rulings have not involved people that were handling dollars? (Serious question; most of the regulatory activity I've seen has been pointing out to people accepting dollars that they are money transmitters)
- wmf 13y agoTrendon Shavers, although I think the case is still pending.
- maxerickson 13y agoThat calls bitcoin a 'virtual currency' and treats the crime as securities and mail fraud. I wouldn't call it a shining example of the government attacking bitcoin.