22 ms·
A lot of this page dates back to a few years back when glibc had severe bugs in its maintainer, and the eglibc branch/fork was the better choice. Regardless, gi
by Sanddancer 13y ago
A lot of this page dates back to a few years back when glibc had severe bugs in its maintainer, and the eglibc branch/fork was the better choice. Regardless, given the commonalities of the codebases, it's doubtful that the numbers between glibc and eglibc are going to be much different.