I see a lot of folks suggesting that the ruling is somehow evidence of intergovernmental pressure or elsewise improper. Is that just based on how you'd like th

I see a lot of folks suggesting that the ruling is somehow evidence of intergovernmental pressure or elsewise improper. Is that just based on how you'd like the case to have turned out, or is there some greater level of familiarity with the laws and jurisprudence of NZ than I'd have expected at HN? Is it possible that the warrant was ok and that the initial ruling was in error? At any rate, according to the article there seems to be another court which can hear an appeal, so it may not be entirely decided yet.