> Refactoring a statically typed language is easier than refactoring an interpreted one Compiled vs interpreted is very different than dynamically typed vs sta

> Refactoring a statically typed language is easier than refactoring an interpreted one Compiled vs interpreted is very different than dynamically typed vs statically type! Yes, I can't name any statically typed language that is interpreted (or that has an interpreter actually used in production, to be more exact), but we're still talking about different things. I guess this is some kind o "semantic typo", but... really? Am I supposed to trust the opinion of whoever wrote this?!