3 ms·
Ah, very clever, omitting the question mark at the end of the title, thereby avoiding the imperatives of Betteridge's Law by technicality. EDIT: And I see the
by webwielder 13y ago
Ah, very clever, omitting the question mark at the end of the title, thereby avoiding the imperatives of Betteridge's Law by technicality.
EDIT: And I see the actual article title got around the law in a different way, by asking the question such that the answer "No" is nonsensical! Still, I like the sound of that exchange:
Writer: What if Apple bought Tesla?
Me: NO
- webwielder 13y agoPost itself rendered nonsensical by title change.
- kristianp 13y agoHa yes, exactly. This article is a big fantasy by someone who thinks Apple can bring something to Tesla apart from some design rules for the tablet in the dash.