So what you've changed is to center the information (not a big deal, move a whole load of useful information to the rear and use a more up to date logo. Seems

So what you've changed is to center the information (not a big deal, move a whole load of useful information to the rear and use a more up to date logo. Seems pointless. Microsoft have updated their logo four times in the past four years. People update their favourite photo once every couple of months. It also require that corporate directory services allow updating of photos significantly more often, just so people can have a photo of themselves they like. Finally you've ignored practicalities of printing logos. Sounds like a typical design with no understanding of the limitations involved or requirements. Most of the offence here seems to be because you didn't like the photo (because it's passport / security style instead of Faceboook / Instagram esque?) and the 8 bit colour printing. Both of these are intrinsic to the requirements caused by printing badges. By the way, the logo was valid in 2012, not just 1998 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft#Logo http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft#Logo