3 ms·
The idea is to set yourself up in a way that allows you to generate passive income. I like this as in it seems particle and beneficial. I don't think you can ag
by quizbiz 17y ago
The idea is to set yourself up in a way that allows you to generate passive income. I like this as in it seems particle and beneficial. I don't think you can agree with it or disagree with it. It's not morally wrong.
For example, I am not a professional photographer but I have photos on iStockPhoto and ShutterStock. 33 cents per purchase ads up and I have paid for a nice amount of gear with the income generated from photo purchases.
In another example, the google ads still point to my account on an old message board I started. It's 1 check per year at best but it's nice.
If we all put our web designs, a widget of code, anything of that sort for download for free on a page with ads or for $1 on a purchase paid, you will be surprised at how it can add up over a long period of time. That's the idea.
I plan to put some of my own webdesigns on an online gallery, people would pay and get a link to download the .zip. After it's set up, it would be another source passive income flow.
A bit differently, at one point I experimented with answering questions for the text messaging service kgb_ whenever I would watch TV. By forcing myself to do this, I was able to get a nice check at the end of the month. 10 cents for 2 min of work isn't really worth it though.
Making rules for techniques like these is silly. The idea is to make some extra spending money however you can... in my opinion.