2 ms·
Your conclusion doesn't logically follow, given what the GP said: "tons of famous politicians and Wall st execs uses them... but noone else got brought down des
by tripzilch 13y ago
Your conclusion doesn't logically follow, given what the GP said: "tons of famous politicians and Wall st execs uses them... but noone else got brought down despite all the private investigations, wiretaps, and FBI investigations, except the one guy", clearly suggests a conspiracy to get to this particular person regardless of whether they brought their own rope.
You're basically saying "I don't care, he went to a prostitute of his own free will", which is no rational reason to discount the theory that they targeted him specifically, because if he hadn't done so, they'd have either found something else, or made something happen. The fact that they didn't have to, doesn't suggest they did not target him, while the fact that they also didn't out any of the tons of other people, suggests that there might be a reason for this particular person other than mere chance.