> So it’s not enough to say “it looks better this way”. Designers need to make a case for why the team should spend time on fit and finish. That point is centr

> So it’s not enough to say “it looks better this way”. Designers need to make a case for why the team should spend time on fit and finish. That point is central to the post and yet not really followed IMO. Costly changes to the UX should be justified in objective terms, e.g. consistency, color or style matching, differenciation, focus improvement, branding, readability... Not a "it feels better", or "it's delightful" or "I'm a creative person, I know what's right" (<- if it's his/her personnal project this one is OK)