33 ms·
I've read this sentence 5 times and still have no idea what your argument is.
by supercoder 13y ago
I've read this sentence 5 times and still have no idea what your argument is.
- gatehouse 13y agoThere are lots of pictures of naked people online. Millions probably. A visual effect that makes it look like someone is naked isn't that impressive, because there are naked people all over the place. The nudity aspect isn't the most precise description of what makes the bubbles effect interesting, it is the undressing aspect that makes it a interesting psychological/visual effect.
- pessimizer 13y agohence the word 'illusion'?
- omilu 13y agoreading this made me blow mountain dew through my nose into my ramen
- patrickyeon 13y agoAfter the bubbling, the people aren't any "more naked" than before. Their clothes are no longer visible, sure, but the people aren't any more exposed.
- sizzle 13y agonot sure if serious....
- twic 13y agoI don't get it. Of course he's serious. I am genuinely baffled by the people who think bubbled pictures are more NSFW than their unbubbled originals.
- sizzle 13y agobecause if you are at 'work' or such environment that warrants the NSFW (Not Safe For Work) tag distinction and you click on a bubbled picture, it would give the illusion of viewing softcore pornography rather than, say, a typical bikini picture from a social networking site (which would arguably not be okay to view at work to being with).
- afhof 13y agoYour mind fills in the gaps. What makes a picture NSFW is what it makes people think, not so much what it actually is.