I have no 'special interest'. I was responding to the idea that "we can't respond because of starving babies" comment. That is factually untrue, and my respon

I have no 'special interest'. I was responding to the idea that "we can't respond because of starving babies" comment. That is factually untrue, and my response was based on fact, there is money, and it could be used, no babies would stave. But I pointed out it was never considered because if the profit motive. You seem to be railing against a position I am not holding. To simplify: "We could do everything we thought was needed to decrease global warming and no baby would need to starve". I'm not saying: - We need to do something - We are the cause of global warming - Doing the things we think will reduce global warming will actually reduce global warming.