3 ms·
From a manager perspective, you wouldn't want an employee working 60+ hours on a regular basis. When actual crunch-time happened, that employee wouldn't have ro
by overgryphon 13y ago
From a manager perspective, you wouldn't want an employee working 60+ hours on a regular basis. When actual crunch-time happened, that employee wouldn't have room to work more. You likely wouldn't be able to meet expectations, because your under-staffing problem had been hidden by regularly overworking some employees.
- Codhisattva 13y agoCrunch time is a management anti-pattern.
- craigvn 13y agoExactly. Crunch time means oop's management stuffed up, now fix it for us.