> I don't see the point in 5 or 10 teams joining forces to improve the results for a tiny percentage and win the prize. I think the point is who gets the milli

> I don't see the point in 5 or 10 teams joining forces to improve the results for a tiny percentage and win the prize. I think the point is who gets the million dollars. It makes sense that people would group up, probably into as few additional participants as it would take to ensure winning. If you and I were in the vicinity of being able to win independently and we knew we would lose otherwise, I think we have every incentive to team up.