2 ms·
They don't suggest that at all! Can you not read? The key thing you've just conveniently left out is this: overtime is only effective over very short sprints
by mattmanser 13y ago
They don't suggest that at all! Can you not read?
The key thing you've just conveniently left out is this:
overtime is only effective over very short sprints
Operative words. VERY. SHORT.
And overtime, in the context of the article and all the supporting literature, is working more than 40 hours.
Worst still, you or your employees then become stupid. Unimaginative. Burnt out. They make silly mistakes.
Does that sound like a place that will foster innovation and greatness? Is that the kind of company you want to lead?
Kid yourself all you want with your 40-60 'optimal'. But don't cite actual research that says quite the opposite of what you claim.
- yummyfajitas 13y agoAll of the studies I linked to discuss population means. Not a single one addresses the claim Derbasti made about the tails of population distributions. Whenever this topic comes up, people constantly claim tons of research showing 40 hours is some magic right number for everyone everywhere in every industry, yet that research is rarely cited. The best I've seen so far is the post I linked to, which is population means in construction.