4 ms·
That article is so much fluff, and doesn't really say much in the way of hard science. What he's referring to are Quantum Chromodynamics simulations, which in
by 5362677_0010 13y ago
That article is so much fluff, and doesn't really say much in the way of hard science.
What he's referring to are Quantum Chromodynamics simulations, which in very general terms were born out of a desire to simulate the sub-atomic interaction of the nucleus of various elements, mapping nuclear reactions for weapons like the hydrogen bomb, when live fire tests were banned by international treaties.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lattice_QCD https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lattice_QCD
Numerical lattice Quantum Chromodynamic (QCD) calculations
using Monte Carlo methods can be extremely computationally
intensive, requiring the use of the largest available
supercomputers.
It's nice to contemplate the philosophical implications of being able to simulate the stimulated emissions of high-energy gamma ray emissions with high reliability and resolution inside a computer, but where's the meat of the article? It's just eleven paragraphs of "what if?"
- evanb 13y agohttp://arxiv.org/abs/1210.1847 http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.1847 and see my top-level comment for more detail.
- 5362677_0010 13y agoIf I'm the sentient result of an elaborate computer simulation, then you are very obviously an apparatus of those who control the simulation. If that's true, then please cut the shit, and knock on my front door right now, and just come right out and tell me: 5362677_0010? You're a computer simulation.