5 ms·
They didn't mention Facebook. Should they?
by caustic 17y ago
They didn't mention Facebook. Should they?
- jacquesm 17y agoNo, why ? Facebook and google operate in completely different spheres. Twitter should be worried about facebook, after all twitter is a minor feature that can be grafted onto a whole bunch of other sites. Facebook and twitter fans see facebook and twitter as the be-all-end-all, they don't realize that even though they're big they are not nearly as universal as google. Search + ads = product, facebook / twitter / myspace / flavour of the day = fads / fashion.
- halo 17y agoGoogle wants to organise the world's information. Hard to do that when a rival website has a large proportion of that information inside their closed garden.
- litewulf 17y agoI guess though similar arguments could be made for many academic journals, pay-walled sites and things like the deep web. I don't think facebook is really something that is to be worried about except as an example of a broader problem.
- marcusbooster 17y agoFrom what I've read, Facebook has a completely different vision of search than Google - and possible competitor in a number of areas. They want you to be able to query your contacts as you would in "real life". A more humanistic search versus Google's algorithmic one.
- jacquesm 17y agoYes, but that is just within their own little garden. Google has declared the internet their garden, that's a completely different story. It turns them into a major player instead of into a large niche. If facebook were to die tomorrow I doubt there would be any big disturbances in the force (and twitter wouldn't even be noticed, except for some deflation of some egos). If google would die tomorrow morning the internet as we know it would grind to a halt. Search now drives the majority of traffic, plenty of people don't even know how to properly use the url bar any longer and it won't be long before it becomes optional and the search box is your main avenue to the web.
- alanthonyc 17y agoYou make a great point about how to intuitively calculate the value of a website. (Although I should say that I believe the sudden disappearance of facebook would be a pretty big deal, just not along the same lines as the disappearance of google would be.)
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- litewulf 17y agoWhat you're saying may be/probably is true. But I don't think it does much to detract from my point. Facebook probably wishes they could target ads given all their demographic information. They probably want to be able to help users make decisions by leveraging their social graph, but I think in the here-and-now, and probably for the immediate future, that will not be the case. I think it is silly to constantly worry about what everyone else is doing when it is substantially more fruitful to understand what you yourself should be doing.